The Personal Data Protection Act 2010 is often misunderstood. Below are some common misconceptions to watch out for. For further guidance on PDPA compliance, please feel free to get in touch.
Personal Data Protection Act 2010 Read More »
Our Partners Mr Sathiesh K Purushothaman and Mr Mohd Amierul Sharafi Shaharizan, visited the Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) on 2 April 2026 to strengthen institutional ties and explore avenues for collaboration. The visit included discussions on student development and industry engagement, as well as a tour of the faculty’s facilities. VSI is
Engagement with UKM Faculty of Law Read More »
Once appointed, the personal representative must register transmission at the land office. Transmission is the process by which the land office formally recognises the personal representative’s authority to act on the property. Only after transmission can the property be legally transferred to a beneficiary or sold to a purchaser. Any attempt to deal with
Dealing with Property of a Deceased Person Under Malaysian Law: With and Without a Will Read More »
The Johore Bar Corporate & Conveyancing Sub-Committee (“CCSC”) hosted the Conference on “Innovative Conveyancing – Law, Practice, Pitfalls and Future Trends” on 24 January 2026. The conference provided a platform for knowledge-sharing among legal practitioners, the judiciary, and regulators. Our partner, Mr Saravanan Krishnan, Chairperson of the CCSC, delivered the Welcoming Remarks, setting the tone
Conference on Innovative Conveyancing – Law, Practice, Pitfalls and Future Trends Read More »
From 28 to 30 November 2025, VSI held a team-building retreat at Desaru. Members from all our firm branches worked together to compete in several team-management games and activities. It was the perfect opportunity for all of us to connect, collaborate, and enjoy a warm, informal get-together outside the office. The retreat also highlighted VSI’s
VSI Team Building Retreat 2025 Read More »
1. Statutory Framework Under the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA 2012”), an adjudication decision is given “temporary finality”. In other words, it is binding and enforceable immediately, subject to limited statutory challenges. Section 13 of CIPAA provides that an adjudication decision is binding unless: It is set aside by the High Court
Enforcement of Adjudication Awards and Stay Pending Arbitration under CIPAA 2012 Read More »
The High Court has allowed a claim brought by apartment owners against a developer arising from the absence of a promised rooftop garden, awarding damages of RM3 million. This decision underscores the importance of accountability in property development and affirms that purchasers are entitled to rely on the representations made to them. It is a
High Court Confirms Developers’ Obligations to Purchasers Read More »
The Federal Court has granted leave to appeal on a significant question of law concerning the doctrine of lifting the corporate veil. The High Court allowed our clients’ claim, however on appeal, the Court of Appeal reversed the finding, holding that the corporate veil cannot be lifted to impose liability on a separate corporate entity.
2026 Condo owners allowed, to take over in suit against developer – FMT, 18 May 2026 Mum sues school for discovery over lewd messages sent using daughter’s name – FMT, 17 May 2026 Private hospital, surgeon not liable in hand surgery negligence case – FMT, 17 April 2026 2025 Apartment owners win RM3mil suit
Industrial explosions have a way of revealing truths that often stay hidden during normal operations. A spark can ignite in a matter of seconds, exposing every flaw in safety planning, oversight, and legal accountability. After the smoke clears, there will be a financial and legal reckoning in addition to a physical cleanup. The question then
Explosion Liability in High-Risk Industries Read More »
